References
Oulehle, F. et al. Major changes in forest carbon and nitrogen cycling caused by declining sulphur deposition. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 3115–3129 (2011).
Du, E., Fenn, M. E., De Vries, W. & Ok, Y. S. Atmospheric nitrogen deposition to global forests: status, impacts and management options. Environ. Pollut. 250, 1044–1048 (2019).
CAS Google Scholar
Butler, T. J., Likens, G. E., Vermeylen, F. M. & Stunder, B. J. B. The impact of changing nitrogen oxide emissions on wet and dry nitrogen deposition in the northeastern USA. Atmos. Environ. 39, 4851–4862 (2005).
CAS Google Scholar
Burns, D. A., Fenn, M. E. & Baron, J. S. Effects of acid deposition on ecosystems: advances in the state of the science (USGS Publications Warehouse, 2011); http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/70194383
Du, E., De Vries, W., Galloway, J. N., Hu, X. & Fang, J. Changes in wet nitrogen deposition in the United States between 1985 and 2012. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 095004 (2014).
CAS Google Scholar
Nopmongcol, U., Beardsley, R., Kumar, N., Knipping, E. & Yarwood, G. Changes in United States deposition of nitrogen and sulfur compounds over five decades from 1970 to 2020. Atmos. Environ. 209, 144–151 (2019).
CAS Google Scholar
Clark, C. M. et al. Atmospheric deposition and exceedances of critical loads from 1800−2025 for the conterminous United States. Ecol. Appl. 28, 978–1022 (2018).
Li, Y. et al. Increasing importance of deposition of reduced nitrogen in the United States. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 5874–5879 (2016).
CAS Google Scholar
Walker, J. T. et al. Toward the improvement of total nitrogen deposition budgets in the United States. Sci. Total Environ. 691, 1328–1352 (2019).
CAS Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. et al. Long-term trends in total inorganic nitrogen and sulfur deposition in the US from 1990 to 2010. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18, 9091–9106 (2018).
CAS Google Scholar
Fenn, M. E. et al. Evaluating the effects of nitrogen and sulfur deposition and ozone on tree growth and mortality in California using a spatially comprehensive forest inventory. Ecol. Manage. 465, 118084 (2020).
Horn, K. J. et al. Growth and survival relationships of 71 tree species with nitrogen and sulfur deposition across the conterminous U.S. PLoS ONE 13, e0205296 (2018).
Thomas, R. Q., Canham, C. D., Weathers, K. C. & Goodale, C. L. Increased tree carbon storage in response to nitrogen deposition in the US. Nat. Geosci. 3, 13–17 (2010).
Bobbink, R. et al. Global assessment of nitrogen deposition effects on terrestrial plant diversity: a synthesis. Ecol. Appl. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1140.1 (2010).
Clark, C. M., Thomas, R. Q. & Horn, K. J. Above-ground tree carbon storage in response to nitrogen deposition in the US is heterogeneous and may have weakened. Commun. Earth Environ. 4, 35 (2023).
Sullivan, T. J. et al. Effects of acidic deposition and soil acidification on sugar maple trees in the Adirondack Mountains, New York. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 12687–12694 (2013).
CAS Google Scholar
Bowman, W. D., Cleveland, C. C., Halada, Ĺ., Hreško, J. & Baron, J. S. Negative impact of nitrogen deposition on soil buffering capacity. Nat. Geosci. 1, 767–770 (2008).
CAS Google Scholar
Clark, J. R., Hemery, G. E. & Savill, P. S. Early growth and form of common walnut (Juglans regia L.) in mixture with tree and shrub nurse species in southern England. Forestry 81, 631–644 (2008).
Gilliam, F. S. et al. Decreased atmospheric nitrogen deposition in eastern North America: predicted responses of forest ecosystems. Environ. Pollut. 244, 560–574 (2019).
CAS Google Scholar
Fenn, M. E. et al. Nitrogen excess in North American ecosystems: predisposing factors, ecosystem responses, and management strategies. Ecol. Appl. 8, 706–633 (1998).
Pardo, L. H. et al. Effects of nitrogen deposition and empirical nitrogen critical loads for ecoregions of the United States. Ecol. Appl. 21, 3049–3082 (2011).
Hyvönen, R. et al. Impact of long-term nitrogen addition on carbon stocks in trees and soils in northern Europe. Biogeochemistry 89, 121–137 (2008).
Magill, A. H. et al. Ecosystem response to 15 years of chronic nitrogen additions at the Harvard Forest LTER, Massachusetts, USA. Ecol. Manage. 196, 7–28 (2004).
Wallace, Z. P., Lovett, G. M., Hart, J. E. & Machona, B. Effects of nitrogen saturation on tree growth and death in a mixed-oak forest. Ecol. Manage. 243, 210–218 (2007).
Driscoll, C. T., Driscoll, K. M., Mitchell, M. J. & Raynal, D. J. Effects of acidic deposition on forest and aquatic ecosystems in New York State. Environ. Pollut. 123, 327–336 (2003).
CAS Google Scholar
St. Clair, S. B. & Lynch, J. P. Differences in the success of sugar maple and red maple seedlings on acid soils are influenced by nutrient dynamics and light environment. Plant Cell Environ. 28, 874–885 (2005).
Adams, M. B., Kochenderfer, J. N. & Edwards, P. J. The Fernow watershed acidification study: ecosystem acidification, nitrogen saturation and base cation leaching. Water Air Soil Pollut. 7, 267–273 (2007).
CAS Google Scholar
Werner, B. & Spranger, T. (eds) Manual on methodologies and criteria for mapping critical levels/loads and geographical areas where they are exceeded. (Federal Environmental Agency, 1996).
Schulze, E. D. et al. Critical loads for nitrogen deposition on forest ecosystems. Water Air Soil Pollut. 48, 451–456 (1989).
CAS Google Scholar
Nilsson, J. Critical loads for sulphur and nitrogen. In Air Pollution and Ecosystems (ed. Mathy, P.) 85–91 (Springer, 1988); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4003-1_11
CLAD Critical Load Definitions Version 1.1 (NADP, 2017).
Ellis, R. A. et al. Present and future nitrogen deposition to national parks in the United States: critical load exceedances. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 9083–9095 (2013).
Geiser, L. H., Nelson, P. R., Jovan, S. E., Root, H. T. & Clark, C. M. Assessing ecological risks from atmospheric deposition of nitrogen and sulfur to US forests using epiphytic macrolichens. Diversity 11, 87 (2019).
CAS Google Scholar
Clark, C. M. et al. Potential vulnerability of 348 herbaceous species to atmospheric deposition of nitrogen and sulfur in the United States. Nat. Plants 5, 697–705 (2019).
CAS Google Scholar
Simkin, S. M. et al. Conditional vulnerability of plant diversity to atmospheric nitrogen deposition across the United States. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 4086–4091 (2016).
CAS Google Scholar
Wilkins, K., Clark, C. & Aherne, J. Ecological thresholds under atmospheric nitrogen deposition for 1200 herbaceous species and 24 communities across the United States. Glob. Change Biol. 28, 2381–2395 (2022).
CAS Google Scholar
Smith, W. B. Forest inventory and analysis: a national inventory and monitoring program. Environ. Pollut. 116, S233–S242 (2002).
CAS Google Scholar
Canham, C. D. & Murphy, L. The demography of tree species response to climate: sapling and canopy tree growth. Ecosphere 7, e01474 (2016).
Canham, C. D. & Murphy, L. The demography of tree species response to climate: sapling and canopy tree survival. Ecosphere 8, e01701 (2017).
Bell, M. D. et al. A framework to quantify the strength of ecological links between an environmental stressor and final ecosystem services. Ecosphere 8, e01806 (2017).
Wilson, B. T., Lister, A. J. & Riemann, R. I. A nearest-neighbor imputation approach to mapping tree species over large areas using forest inventory plots and moderate resolution raster data. Ecol. Manage. 271, 182–198 (2012).
Wilson, B. T., Lister, A. J., Riemann, R. I. & Griffith, D. M. Live Tree Species Basal Area of the Contiguous United States (2000–2009) (USDA, 2013).
Pavlovic, N. R. et al. Empirical nitrogen and sulfur critical loads of US tree species and their uncertainties with machine learning. Sci. Total Environ. 857, 159252 (2023).
CAS Google Scholar
Clark, C. M. et al. (eds) Air Pollution Effects on Forests: A Guide to Species Ecology, Ecosystem Services, and Responses to Nitrogen and Sulfur Deposition Trees Vol. 1. Trees. FS-1156 (USDA, 2021); https://www.fs.usda.gov/research/treesearch/63567
Kleijn, D., Bekker, R. M., Bobbink, R., De Graaf, M. C. C. & Roelofs, J. G. M. In search for key biogeochemical factors affecting plant species persistence in heathland and acidic grasslands: a comparison of common and rare species. J. Appl. Ecol. 45, 680–687 (2008).
CAS Google Scholar
Bobbink, R. et al. Empirical nitrogen critical loads for natural and semi-natural ecosystems: 2002 update. In Empirical Critical Loads for Nitrogen Expert Workshop Proc. (ed. Achermann, B.) 43–170 (Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape, 2003).
Stevens, C. J. et al. Ecosystem responses to reduced and oxidised nitrogen inputs in European terrestrial habitats. Environ. Pollut. 159, 665–676 (2011).
CAS Google Scholar
Van den Berg, L. J. L., Peters, C. J. H., Ashmore, M. R. & Roelofs, J. G. M. Reduced nitrogen has a greater effect than oxidised nitrogen on dry heathland vegetation. Environ. Pollut. 154, 359–369 (2008).
Wildfire Statistics (Congressional Research Service, 2022).
Policy Assessment for the Review of the Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (US EPA, 2020).
Warner, J. X. et al. Increased atmospheric ammonia over the world’s major agricultural areas detected from space. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 2875–2884 (2017).
CAS Google Scholar
Fenn, M. E. et al. On-road emissions of ammonia: an underappreciated source of atmospheric nitrogen deposition. Sci. Total Environ. 625, 909–919 (2018).
CAS Google Scholar
NADP Program Office, Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hyiene. National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NRSP-3) https://nadp.slh.wisc.edu/data-and-information-use-conditions/ (2022).
Schwede, D. B. & Lear, G. G. A novel hybrid approach for estimating total deposition in the United States. Atmos. Environ. 92, 207–220 (2014).
CAS Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. C., Chojnacky, D. C., Heath, L. S. & Birdsey, R. A. National-scale biomass estimators for United States tree species. For. Sci. 49, 12–35 (2003).
Master Tree Species List Version 9.2 (USFS, 2022).
Omernik, J. M. & Griffith, G. E. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States: evolution of a hierarchical spatial framework. Environ. Manage. 54, 1249–1266 (2014).
Homer, C. et al. Completion of the 2001 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 73, 337 (2007).
Kattge, J. et al. TRY plant trait database—enhanced coverage and open access. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 119–188 (2020).
Daly, C. et al. Physiographically sensitive mapping of climatological temperature and precipitation across the conterminous United States. Int. J. Climatol. 28, 2031–2064 (2008).
O’Brien, R. M. A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Qual. Quant. 41, 673–690 (2007).
2019 TIGER/Line Shapefiles (US Census Bureau, 2020).
